Before arriving in the Yukon, the group completed levels I and II of the N.A.P.I. program. The N.A.P.I. program is based on the University of Calgary’s leadership training program, however it has been modified to include Indigenous perspectives and knowledge. On our second day at AINA, we all gathered in the classroom to begin level III of the program. We began by participating in an exercise about the process of colonization. In this exercise, we identified words that we associated with Canadian identity. Then we were forced to choose which of these ideas we would keep if we could only choose ten of them. This was a difficult process, as it necessarily involved sacrificing certain core values in order to retain others. Then, two of the participants were asked to leave the room, and returned to negotiate how Canada could hypothetically be divided up while only speaking in a different language. This exercise got us thinking about what negotiating treaties might have looked like, and how conflicts between different worldviews would have caused breakdowns in communications and unfair power dynamics. Then we watched a video about a Cherokee community who, after waiting for years for the U.S. Government to provide clean drinking water to their community, took matters into their own hands and built a pipeline to transport water which was an unprecedented action. This related to discussions we had been having about community and the importance of taking initiative. It also demonstrated indigenous concepts of self-determination.
On the third day at AINA, we gathered again in the classroom for the second part of the N.A.P.I. program level III. We discussed ideas concerning humanitarianism and globalization and talked about its benefits and consequences toward a community. Humanitarianism, as defined by us, is a type of service that a person can do to another person; but being in training for the N.A.P.I. program, humanitarianism is not just about the people anymore. Humanitarianism, for us, is now defined as a service that a person can do to another person, animal, tree, or nature in general. Humanitarianism is not all good either. There’s a term commonly known as the “white saviour syndrome” which describes the type of service done by people to others that cause more harm than help. This idea led to a talk about globalization and how it affects communities in the micro and macro level. Health and well-being, economy, and culture were ones of the many topics that we talked about. After weighing the benefits and consequences of globalizing such topics, we have concluded that there are as many benefits as there are consequences. For example, in health and well-being, globalizing health treatments and strategies will broaden the knowledge in the medical field, however this will create an uproar within the people because many are close-minded and are unwilling to accept the belief systems of other cultures.
Jordan and Xyleen